https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83706
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Caused by fact we have a sreal number:
(gdb) p x
$1 = {m_sig = 2096921321, m_exp = -21}
(gdb) p x.to_double()
$2 = 999.89000368118286
That is transformed in sreal::to_int to:
(m_sig >> -m_exp)
which ends with 999.
Maybe a smarted rounding will be useful.
Anyway, can inline_param_summary::change_prob be sreal insread of int. Doing
conversion back and forth looks cumbersome.
