https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83888
Bug ID: 83888 Summary: [8 regression] new failures after r256639 on armhf Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: clyon at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- As I mentioned in PR83836, r256639 introduced new regressions on arm-none-linux-gnueabihf: gcc.dg/vect/no-fast-math-vect16.c scan-tree-dump-times vect "using an in-order \\(fold-left\\) reduction" 1 (found 0 times) gcc.dg/vect/vect-reduc-6.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects scan-tree-dump-times vect "using an in-order \\(fold-left\\) reduction" 1 (found 0 times) gcc.dg/vect/vect-reduc-6.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorized 1 loops" 1 (found 0 times) gcc.dg/vect/vect-reduc-6.c scan-tree-dump-times vect "using an in-order \\(fold-left\\) reduction" 1 (found 0 times) gcc.dg/vect/vect-reduc-6.c scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorized 1 loops" 1 (found 0 times) Seen on arm-none-linux-gnueabihf --with-mode arm --with-cpu cortex-a9 --with-fpu neon-fp16