--- Comment #5 from Adam Conrad <adconrad at 0c3 dot net> ---
(In reply to Javier Serrano Polo from comment #1)
> Adam, if you had to come up with multiarch interpreter names for traditional
> architectures, which would be the proper place to discuss?

As Andrew says, the ABI is fixed.  I understand that you run a kernel
patch/module to alias interpreters to other paths, but this isn't something we
can or should support upstream.

If I had a time machine, I could give you a list of interpreter names I would
have argued for two decades ago.  I don't have a time machine and, thus, such a
discussion is pointless and, frankly, now that you've dragged me into this in
three different forums, tiresome.

Reply via email to