Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |ASSIGNED
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2018-02-09
           Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot      |jakub at gcc dot
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot> ---
Created attachment 43387

That said, if the target has c99 runtime and the constant is a power of 2, I
can't imagine why exp2 (log2 (C) * x) wouldn't be faster and more precise than
exp (log (C) * x).

Reply via email to