Peter Bergner <bergner at gcc dot> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
           Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot      |bergner at gcc dot

--- Comment #3 from Peter Bergner <bergner at gcc dot> ---
This looks to be a similar problem that I fixed in PR83399 except that the
store here isn't generated by a builtin, but by Kelvin's optimization here:

My guess is we'll need a similar fix here, meaning tighten some predicates used
in some vsx patterns/splitters.  I'll have a look.

Reply via email to