Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2018-02-14
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot> ---

(In reply to Oleg Oshmyan from comment #0)
> Here are my gcc -v and uname -a, which I doubt will be useful but are
> requested on

Thank you for providing them though.

> For reference, I have also tried GCC 6.3.0 and 5.1.0 (which do not
> understand -fstrong-eval-order but do understand -std=c++17), and they use
> the same order as GCC 7.3.0.

Unsurprising, since GCC 5 and GCC 6 were released before the evaluation order
rules changed in the C++17 drafts. Understanding the -std=c++17 option doesn't
mean they conform to the final standard and this evaluation order is how GCC
always did it.

Reply via email to