--- Comment #8 from Peter Bergner <bergner at gcc dot> ---
(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #7)
> See -- I think
> Kaushik
> is still looking at this?

Ah, ok.  I do agree with your comment to use the *_2op_si pattern.

Do you agree we could combine these patterns?  If so, I could do that as a
followon cleanup patch.

Reply via email to