https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84419

--- Comment #4 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org <rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org> 
---
Created attachment 43456
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43456&action=edit
Possible patch

I think the problem was that the optimisation was dropping
the alignment information, so we ended up using an aligned
rather than an unaligned access.

I don't have access to skylake hardware, but could you
try the attached patch?

Reply via email to