--- Comment #15 from H.J. Lu < at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #14)
> Created attachment 43643 [details]
> Proposed patch
> Hi Guys.
>   Here is a possible patch, although it is a bit hackish.
>   Richard might not like it because it changes gcc/lto-wrapper.c rather than
>   the linker, but I honestly think that the linker is doing the right thing
>   in this case.

It should be fixed in linker.

Reply via email to