https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84919

--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #3)
> Umm, isn't that invalid code?  The whole point of the warning is to catch
> precisely this kind of broken idiom.  Right?

Why is it invalid?  Argument 4 is for %p. It looks valid to me.

Reply via email to