--- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> ---
On Fri, 6 Apr 2018, ktietz at gcc dot wrote:

> Kai Tietz <ktietz at gcc dot> changed:
>            What    |Removed                     |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                  CC|                            |ktietz at gcc dot
> --- Comment #2 from Kai Tietz <ktietz at gcc dot> ---
> as intermediate the duplication of darwin's logic is fine. Nevertheless I 
> would
> prefer proper support of COFF here.

Of course.  I asked for help here (similar for Mach-O and darwin) about
one and a half years ago.

The proposed mitigation should get you about as much debug info with LTO
as in the pre-early-LTO debug era.  So all you should (in theory) get
is no "better" debug...

Reply via email to