Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
             Target|i?86-*-*, powerpc64-*-*,    |powerpc64-*-*, spu-*-*
                   |spu-*-*                     |
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2018-04-10
          Component|tree-optimization           |testsuite
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot> ---
HJs testers do not show the failure on i?86 anymore.  The other regressions
must be older, likely since testcase introduction in June 2017 which means
they are a testsuite issue.

Rainer, the rev. range you quoted was for the i?86 FAIL, right?

Bin, can you check with a cross what happens for powerpc64 and spu and
adjust/XFAIL the testcase accordingly?

Confirmed for powerpc64-* by looking at gcc-testresults.

Reply via email to