https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85238
--- Comment #24 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> --- On Thu, 12 Apr 2018, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85238 > > --- Comment #23 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> --- > > Huh, no. Never seen that. > > Well, well, well... ;-) He! Thanks - counts as obvious. > Index: lto-wrapper.c > =================================================================== > --- lto-wrapper.c (revision 259205) > +++ lto-wrapper.c (working copy) > @@ -983,7 +983,7 @@ debug_objcopy (const char *infile) > infile = fname; > inoff = (off_t) loffset; > } > - int infd = open (infile, O_RDONLY); > + int infd = open (infile, O_RDONLY | O_BINARY); > if (infd == -1) > return NULL; > simple_object_read *inobj = simple_object_start_read (infd, inoff,
