Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
           Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot      |jakub at gcc dot

--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot> ---
Ok, it is the fix_up_crossing_landing_pad function that is buggy.
It simply assumes that a landing pad basic block contains only the landing pad
instructions and nothing else; as this testcase proves, it is a wrong
Either we could really duplicate the bb, or, IMHO better, instead of partially
duplicating it just emit a label and jump (cross partition) to the existing
landing pad.

Reply via email to