https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85635
--- Comment #9 from John Marino <gnugcc at marino dot st> --- Those "many" people don't build gnat. Very few people do according to the testsuite results page. link.c code was: #if defined (__WIN32) (block 1) #elif defined (__hpux__) (block 2) #elif defined (__FreeBSD__) || defined (__DragonFly__) \ || defined (__NetBSD__) || defined (__OpenBSD__) || defined (__QNX__) (block 3) #elif defined (__APPLE__) (block 4) #elif defined (__linux__) || defined (__GLIBC__) (block 5) #elif defined (_AIX) (block 6) #elif (HAVE_GNU_LD) (block 7) #elif defined (VMS) (block 8) #elif defined (__sun__) (block 9) #elif defined (__svr4__) && defined (__i386__) (block 10) #else (block 11) #endif I don't see how it would have compiled on linux. The cpp would have chocked on __QNX__ check on the __linux__ platform just as it would for any of the BSDs. It wasn't a BSD-only issue.
