https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57160
--- Comment #8 from Thomas Koenig <tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #7) > > It is not actually a complete duplicate of PR 85599, > > it is just similar. > > What is different? Is "different chunks of code are required" good enough? :-) > IMO the two PRs should be closed as WONTFIX. We will discuss it on the mailing list when I submit the patch, I suppose.
