https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86536
Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed| |2018-07-17
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot
gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Confirmed, as fork returns twice, I'm probably fine with reflecting that.
Marco what do you think about:
$ gcov pr86536.c -t -ab
-: 0:Source:pr86536.c
-: 0:Graph:pr86536.gcno
-: 0:Data:pr86536.gcda
-: 0:Runs:1
-: 0:Programs:1
-: 1:int foo;
-: 2:
function main called 1 returned 200% blocks executed 88%
1: 3:int main(void) {
1: 4: int j = 22;
-: 5:
1: 6: fork();
1: 6-block 0
call 0 returned 200%
-: 7:
2: 8: int i = 7;
-: 9:
2: 10: if (foo)
branch 0 taken 0% (fallthrough)
branch 1 taken 100%
#####: 11: foo ++;
%%%%%: 11-block 0
-: 12:
90: 13: for (int i = 0; i < 44; i++)
2: 13-block 0
90: 13-block 1
branch 0 taken 98%
branch 1 taken 2% (fallthrough)
88: 14: foo++;
88: 14-block 0
-: 15:
2: 16: return 0;
2: 16-block 0
-: 17:}
