https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69179

--- Comment #4 from Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #3)
> (In reply to sandra from comment #0)
> > config/darwin.c defines attributes "apple_kext_compatibility" and
> > "weak_import" which have no documentation in the GCC manual.
> > 
> > "apple_kext_compatibility" seems related to the also-undocumented
> > -fapple-kext command-line option (see PR 62273).  Reading the code, I'm
> > wondering if a feature intended to provide backwards compatibility with GCC
> > 2.95 is even relevant to modern versions of Darwin, or whether this might be
> > a candidate for deletion as obsolete.
> 
> The purpose of the attribute is to allow the VTABLE for c++ (in kernel
> modules) to be altered to be compatible with GCC2.95 layouts for use with
> Darwin <= 8. There is an outside possibility it might be relevant to m32
> Darwin9 (this needs checking).
> 
> This option is recognised but not implemented - it looks like the
> APPLE_LOCAL changes in 4.2.1 were never upstreamed (or never accepted, or
> subsequently removed).
> 
> I think, documentation-wise, we could (now) note the facts (i.e. that it's
> recognised in sources but unimplemented).
> 
> For the future;
> 1. I doubt that there's any serious appetite for introducing intrusive
> changes to c++ to support an EOL platform (if we do it at all I'd say save
> it for a "Vendor Branch").  ISTM that folks who need to support such kernel
> modules are not looking for up-to-date c++11 features and could just use
> apple g++-4.2.
> 
> 2. We should introduce at least a warning in the current source that the
> option is not enacted.
> 
> 3. Unless anyone disagrees with (1) and has the time/enthusiasm to implement
> and push the implementation though, I think we should note that this
> attribute is deprecated
> 

I have the time/enthusiasm but neither the know-how nor confidence nor
attention span 

> 4. It's likely that we should review whether the -fapple-kext stuff has any
> function/meaning [to the ppc port] as things stand.

Reply via email to