--- Comment #2 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2018-08-11 3:31 PM, redi at gcc dot wrote:
> --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot> ---
> Does hppa64 really not have native atomic ops for sizeof(void*) ?
Sadly, it lacks an atomic compare and exchange operation.  The mutex 
support might have some form
of kernel support but I don't know what it is.

I've been working on atomic load and store support.
> I guess we need to use a mutex here, as I don't want libstdc++ to depend on
> libatomic.


Reply via email to