https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87237
Alexander Monakov <amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from Alexander Monakov <amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC assumes the access is sufficiently aligned for an atomic object of
corresponding type, so either the documentation needs to mention that, or gcc
should stop "upgrading" alignment.
typedef int i1 __attribute__((aligned(1)));
int f(i1 *p)
{
return __atomic_load_n(p, __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
}
We expand the load to (note A32)
(insn 6 3 7 2 (set (reg:SI 87 [ _4 ])
(mem/v:SI (reg/v/f:DI 89 [ p ]) [-1 S4 A32])) ttt.c:5 -1
(nil))
