https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87521

--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #6)
> Yes, on IRC Bruno already pointed out the problem with the comment 3
> example. That doesn't change my mind, I still think it would be madness for
> an defaulted-on-first-declaration trivial destructor to change the type's
> layout.

Which is what Daveed says in the github issue.

Reply via email to