https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87521
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #6) > Yes, on IRC Bruno already pointed out the problem with the comment 3 > example. That doesn't change my mind, I still think it would be madness for > an defaulted-on-first-declaration trivial destructor to change the type's > layout. Which is what Daveed says in the github issue.