https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87855
--- Comment #8 from Ville Voutilainen <ville.voutilainen at gmail dot com> --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #7) > (In reply to fiesh from comment #0) > > (If this is true, is it > > a separate gcc bug that it does not delete the union's constructor?) > > Yes, I think so. Could you please file a Component=c++ bug too? When doing so, please check whether it's actually about not deleting the union's copy constructor, as opposed to possibly too eager copy elision.
