https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88022
--- Comment #5 from chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #4) > Agree with Jakub that if really not necessary, I wouldn't complicate > libsanitizer. My point was that we won't need to complicate libsanitizer -- almost all necessary code is already there, just need to enable it for Linux. > Slowness is nicely seen in your table Maxim: > https://github.com/google/sanitizers/issues/837#issuecomment-322519336 > > Can you Maximum more describe which difficulties do you see using > libsanitizer on 32-bit ARM target? AFAIR we had problems with PIE binaries on ARM (and we still have them). Anyways, if you don't interested, I'm not insist on implementing this feature in GCC. Just be informed that sanitizer runtime is almost ready for this to be implemented.
