https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88362
--- Comment #6 from joseph at codesourcery dot com <joseph at codesourcery dot com> --- On Wed, 5 Dec 2018, msebor at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > so that we get consistent behavior for reference members. __alignof__ should > return the corresponding alignment. For example, in the following all three But why should __alignof__ on a reference be consistent with __alignof__ on a pointer, rather than being consistent with e.g. assignment to the reference (i.e. returning the alignment of the underlying object pointed to)?
