https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87957
--- Comment #20 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> --- > I guess the middle-end relies on TYPE_NAME to have the TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT > type rather than be qualified. The question if just here and it is possible > to cope with that, or elsewhere too. Yes, but only here and only for a couple of weeks, i.e. it's a novelty.