https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87957

--- Comment #20 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> I guess the middle-end relies on TYPE_NAME to have the TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT
> type rather than be qualified.  The question if just here and it is possible
> to cope with that, or elsewhere too.

Yes, but only here and only for a couple of weeks, i.e. it's a novelty.

Reply via email to