https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88684
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|9.0 |---
Summary|[7/8/9 Regression] Please |Please make
|make |SANITIZER_NON_UNIQUE_TYPEIN
|SANITIZER_NON_UNIQUE_TYPEIN |FO a runtime flag (or
|FO a runtime flag (or |always true)
|always true) |
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Why is this actually considered a regression?
While in GCC 6 and older libsanitizer didn't have SANITIZER_NON_UNIQUE_TYPEINFO
macro, it performed only == comparisons of the string pointers, so in the end
it acted as if the current default of SANITIZER_NON_UNIQUE_TYPEINFO. Not
suitable for libstdc++, sure, but not a regression.
That said, I'm willing to ack it for GCC9 even then if upstream comes up with
something or if they don't care, eventually as a GCC only tweak.
