https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88954
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> --- (In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #1) > I'm wondering if noplt is meant to be a property of the function pointer or > that of its type? > > Either way, what should happen in cases when a noplt pointer is assigned the > address of a PLT function? E.g.,: > > void (*p_noplt)(void) = f_noplt; > > void f (int i) > { > if (i < 0) > p_noplt = f_plt; > } > > Do calls through p_noplt still happen without the use of the PLT after the > assignment? Should a warning be issued when a noplt pointer is assigned the > address of an ordinary PLT function? noplt attribute only applies to function, not function pointer.