https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89125
--- Comment #8 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to kargl from comment #6)
> Checking with FreeBSD developers on C99 compliance.
The answer is 'no'. FreeBSD's C runtime libraries
(libc+libm) are not fully C99 complaint. It is a shame,
too.
Unfortunately and I should have remembered, FreeBSD's C runtime
libraries (ie libc+libm) are not C99 compliant. The problem (for me)
is that function_c99_math_complex indicates that libm includes
a complete set of C99 complex math function, which of course
it doesn't. Testing with GCC trunk gives
1 default_libc_has_function (C99 compliant libc+libm)
2 no_c99_libc_has_function (FreeBSD current setting)
1 2
=== gcc Summary ===
# of expected passes 134923 134887
# of unexpected failures 171 207 <-- This is good.
# of unexpected successes 27 27
# of expected failures 550 550
# of unresolved testcases 14 14
# of unsupported tests 2222 2222
=== g++ Summary ===
# of expected passes 124009 124009
# of unexpected failures 41 41
# of expected failures 548 548
# of unsupported tests 5585 5585
=== gfortran Summary ===
# of expected passes 48992 48993
# of unexpected failures 2 1 <-- This is bad.
# of expected failures 130 130
# of unsupported tests 88 88
'This is bad' occurs because FreeBSD is missing cexpl
and the fallback in libgfortran/intrinsics/c99_functions.c
seems to be broken on FreeBSD if default_libc_has_function
is used.
