https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89112
--- Comment #6 from Segher Boessenkool <segher at gcc dot gnu.org> --- The patch in #c5 is pre-approved everywhere. Thanks! #c4... Do you *want* to keep it together? Is it in fact cold? If it is not, maybe you can improve the execution estimate for it?
