https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89077
--- Comment #12 from Harald Anlauf <anlauf at gmx dot de> ---
Further variant:
==> f4.f90 <==
character(1), save :: y = transfer ([('a'(1:1),i=1,1)], 'x')
print *, y
end
generates exactly the same code as f3, although it passes along slightly
different pathes during simplification.
BTW, I noticed that f1 produces an IMHO insane dump-tree, with a call
to _gfortran_internal_pack!
I'd never expected to get such inefficient code in that case.
