https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88711
--- Comment #7 from Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu> --- On Sat, Feb 09, 2019 at 06:12:53PM +0000, hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88711 > > --- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka <hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org> --- > Definitly not P1 anymore. The testcase is still not optimized well, but I > think > it falls into the general category that Fotran programming style prefers more > inlining than C/C++ and it may make sense to declare all Fortran functions > inline or have some other flag telling middle-end to inline more. > Interesting. So, my interpretation is "I committed a patch that causes a regression in the Fortran testsuite. Clearly, the problem is with Fortran not my patch. I don't care about Fortran or respect those that work on the Fortran FE. Therefore, I just XFAIL the regressing test case and call it Good(tm)." Thanks. How about reverting your patch?
