https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89344
urbanjost at comcast dot net changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |diagnostic
Summary|intent |uncaught programmer error:
| |polymorphic variable is
| |INTENT(IN) but assigned to
| |without error
--- Comment #1 from urbanjost at comcast dot net ---
program demo_setval
call setval(value)
write(*,*)'VALUE=',value
CONTAINS
subroutine setval(value)
class(*),intent(in) :: value
select type(value)
type is (integer); value=10
type is (real); value=10.20
end select
end subroutine setval
end program demo_setval
! expect to get something like
! Error: Dummy argument 'value' with INTENT(IN) in variable definition
context (assignment) at (1)
! but do not even though VALUE is INTENT(IN) and changed the value
There is a programmer error in the example program. The variable VALUE has been
declared to be INTENT(IN) but the routine assigns a value to the variable. This
should be caught at compile time.
