https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89337

--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Rafael Avila de Espindola from comment #10)
> Maybe we should have a general flag that disables all warnings where gcc
> cannot prove that there is a path from a function entry to the broken
> statement?

But what about proving there is a path from program entry to the function?

And now reason why those two are different.

Reply via email to