https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89091
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 45773
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45773&action=edit
gcc9-pr89091.patch
I'd just return NULL in that case. While in theory we could just
build_nonstandard_integer_type or similar, I think for these > 64 bit bitfields
it will be hardly a win and we'd need to ensure the backend will be able to
deal with those types.
