https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89280

--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
On the other side, after going into SSA, the ABNORMAL_DISPATCHER successors
would have PHIs for the SSA_NAMEs and thus ICE like this wouldn't happen, so in
theory we could do something in the cfg pass itself only.

Reply via email to