https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89280
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> --- On the other side, after going into SSA, the ABNORMAL_DISPATCHER successors would have PHIs for the SSA_NAMEs and thus ICE like this wouldn't happen, so in theory we could do something in the cfg pass itself only.