https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89479
Eyal Rozenberg <eyalroz at technion dot ac.il> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|DUPLICATE |---
--- Comment #2 from Eyal Rozenberg <eyalroz at technion dot ac.il> ---
(In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #1)
> Seems similar enough.
With respect - this is not about x being a const __restrict pointer; what I
said (including the clang behavior) applies exactly the same when we remove the
const. See: https://godbolt.org/z/hH643a (where the const is gone).
