https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48957
Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |joseph at codesourcery dot com
--- Comment #3 from Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #2)
> (In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #1)
> > On Wed, 11 May 2011, psmith at gnu dot org wrote:
> >
> > > I think that the include-fixed directory should be associated with the
> > > sysroot,
> >
> > It should be associated with each system include directory (sysroot or
> > otherwise) - so there should be a fixed version of /usr/local/include,
> > searched immediately before /usr/local/include, and likewise for
> > /usr/include.
>
> This sounds like an agreement that some form of change would be worthwhile;
> I'm going to take that as confirmation.
>
> > But there are certainly sysroot uses where include-fixed is
> > still relevant - where the sysroot is based on a copy of that used when
> > GCC was built, but with extra libraries added. (That's the case of
> > sysroots that works most reliably for other reasons as well; GCC's runtime
> > libraries get configured depending on the libc libraries and headers
> > present when GCC was built, and in some cases the headers affect the
> > configuration of GCC itself as well as GCC's libraries.)
> >
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-07/msg02088.html
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2004-11/msg00255.html
>
> Shouldn't it be possible to come up with a solution that still supports
> those cases while also fixing the cases Paul described?
Joseph, can you think of one?
