https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89700
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
You're mistaken.
struct X
{
std::string str = "not empty";
X() = default;
X(const X&) = default;
};
This type does not have a move constructor. Copying an rvalue will perform a
copy (not a move):
X x1;
X x2 = std::move(x1); // calls copy constructor
But it does not have a deleted move constructor. It has no move constructor.
That's different. If it had a deleted move constructor then the initialization
of x2 above would fail to compile.
