https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89985
--- Comment #4 from Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #3) > since the issue of calls to inform being done without checking the return > value of warning[_at] first seems to keep coming up, I almost wonder if it's > worth adding __attribute__((unused_result)) to warning[_at]... er __attribute__((warn_unused_result)) I mean
