https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90249
Segher Boessenkool <segher at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|[9/10 Regression] Code size |[9 Regression] Code size
|regression on thumb2 due to |regression on thumb2 due to
|sub-optimal register |sub-optimal register
|allocation starting with |allocation starting with
|r265398 |r265398
--- Comment #2 from Segher Boessenkool <segher at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
What difference is there on some code of significant size? Do you see
regressions then?
Of course there are some tiny examples where it now does worse, just like
there are examples where it now does better.
