https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90590

--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1)
> This is not a libstdc++ bug, we're allowed to define whatever enumerators we
> want as long as they use reserved names.

Which is almost exactly what I said in the Clang bug you linked to. Nice to
know I'm consistent.

Reply via email to