https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90600
--- Comment #2 from g.peterh...@t-online.de --- Am 23.05.19 um 19:04 schrieb jakub at gcc dot gnu.org: > Note, clang agrees with gcc here, and I don't think it is a good idea to > change > this incompatibly. I think it would be better if there is (on the respective platform) only exactly an absolute type for the significant size and this is consistently used everywhere. Then such problems can not occur at all. PS: I miss the IO-Routines for __int128 (u/int128_t), clang has this. Will they be retrofitted? On 32-bit platforms (and smaller) these types do not exist either. (Can that clang?)
