https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91541
--- Comment #6 from frankhb1989 at gmail dot com --- (In reply to frankhb1989 from comment #5) > > And the noexcept exceptions provided in the current implementations are > really inconsistent, for instance, between move operator= of std::list and > std::map. Whether the fix above is adopted, at least one container > implementation in libstdc++ is not conforming. > Correction: if the additional requirement is adopted, there will be no need to modify libstdc++ code for conformance. The inconsistency will remain literally (`_Node_alloc_traits::_S_nothrow_move()` in the std::list vs. implicit `_Alloc_traits::_S_nothrow_move() ...` implied by _Rb_tree), though.
