https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92584
Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed| |2019-11-20
Blocks| |26163
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
>
> I've tried multiple times to no avail ... :/ But yeah. I'll have another
> look ;) It's gfortran.dg/reassoc_4.f btw. IIRC. See also the
> --param adjustment therein ... Honza lowered the param at some point,
> regressing things.
Hehe, that's good that we have it isolated as a test-case.
Referenced Bugs:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163
[Bug 26163] [meta-bug] missed optimization in SPEC (2k17, 2k and 2k6 and 95)
