https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64329
Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Blocks| |54367
--- Comment #7 from Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #5)
> (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2)
> > (In reply to Michael Stahl from comment #1)
> > > i believe i've hit the same problem
> >
> > I don't think so. The original bug report is for 4.9.3, and seems to be an
> > actual compiler bug that is fixed already in GCC 5 and later.
> >
> > Your case is invalid code. While I agree a warning would be nice, it's not
> > the same as a bug in 4.9.3 that has been fixed.
>
> I've created PR 70692 for the missing warning on the invalid code, since
> it's a different problem to the one in this PR.
ah right, I think this just reminded me of a bug whose number I was trying to
remember for a different bug...
Referenced Bugs:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54367
[Bug 54367] [meta-bug] lambda expressions
