https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92801
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Removal based on modification of DECL_CHAIN() of TYPE_FIELDS(t)
would mean you have to convert either all uses of such types or none. Wouldn't
it be better to rather do it just on particular uses of the types and replace
the types with a new shorter or reordered type instead? I mean, if you in a
couple of functions never access some fields or just write only access them,
but in another spot those fields are used, there is no reason to punt.
