https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93080
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2) > It's a bugfix so applicable for stage3... pre-approved with a testcase. Except it causes a regression on x86_64: FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr54855-8.c scan-assembler-not movsd FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr54855-8.c scan-assembler-times maxsd 1 FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr54855-9.c scan-assembler-not movss FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr54855-9.c scan-assembler-times minss 1 I have not looked into how to fix these regressions though.
