--- Comment #3 from Eyal Rozenberg <eyalroz at technion dot> ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2)
> Oops, that was meant to be print_type<decltype(i)>()

Ok, that's a better kludge than mine - it doesn't have the more serious
shortcomings. That makes the motivation for this feature request more about
convenience / aesthetics. It would still be nice to have.

Reply via email to