https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92267
Romain Geissler <romain.geissler at amadeus dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |romain.geissler at amadeus dot
com
--- Comment #8 from Romain Geissler <romain.geissler at amadeus dot com> ---
Hi Jonathan,
Sorry to jump back into this old bug, but isn't it a issue that this was
backported to gcc 9 after some releases of gcc 9 were in the wild yet ?
I mean, someone having built some binaries with gcc 9.1.0 or 9.2.0, mixing it
later with a binary built with the upcoming gcc 9.3.0 will also see a similar
crash, no ? I think (but I am not sure yet) this is actually happening to me
(although I am not using gcc releases, but directly compile from git from
gcc-9-branch, so I understand my right to complain is low, if not non legit at
all). What is advocated in this case, that all binaries build with gcc 9.1.0 or
9.2.0 shall be rebuilt as well ? Or is there any way that somehow the gcc 9
branch (and not gcc 10 one) can support both ABIs to cope with past mistakes ?
Cheers,
Romain
