https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94175
Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2)
> But for #c1 it is just a missed-optimization, while if the passing of a
> constexpr var to a function isn't an ODR use, isn't it then a standard
> violation that we aren't optimizing the variable read into its value?
True, but the fix is the same.
